KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Feedstock-To-Tailpipe Analysis of Soybean-Derived Biodiesel and Glycerol Valorization in Kansas

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Available after: 2024-08-31 (10.57Mb)
    Issue Date
    2022-08-31
    Author
    Alam, Shah Saud
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    345 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Mechanical Engineering
    Rights
    Copyright held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Biodiesel has become a popular substitute to ultra-low sulfur diesel due to its production from renewable or waste feedstocks and direct use in compression-ignition engines. Biodiesel is currently fabricated via oil transesterification which also produces crude glycerol as a byproduct. The crude glycerol has low economic value and is often disposed of directly and causes environmental harm. However, glycerol is rich in carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Therefore, it is necessary to find ways to valorize glycerol into useful products such as soap, hydrogen, methanol, dimethyl ether (DME), and ammonia to economize biodiesel production and increase profitability. However, the conversion of glycerol into useful products requires material and energy inputs that carry a significant environmental footprint which must be evaluated with the help of a comprehensive life cycle analysis (LCA). Past LCAs of biodiesel have differed in system boundaries, data sources, and co-product allocations resulting in a wide range of energy and emissions results. Therefore, this research reviews the literature and proposes a robust LCA methodology in the form of a Well-to-Exhaust (WtE) analysis, and conducts a comprehensive biodiesel LCA with Kansas as the control volume. The WtE methodology is applied to both renewable and waste feedstocks to determine their renewability.The results show that biodiesel production from soybeans in Kansas has a fossil energy ratio (FER) of 4.64 compared to the national average of 5.54. Moreover, waste cooking oil biodiesel has a higher FER of 6.25, mainly because of the waste feedstock assumption. These values indicate greater scope for biodiesel production in Kansas. Besides, glycerol use for soap and hydrogen production also holds commercial value. Specifically, glycerol (FER = 0.55) can replace methane (FER = 0.59) as the major feedstock for hydrogen production via steam reforming. This could be instrumental in minimizing glycerol waste while offsetting methane use for hydrogen production. Other than these findings, methanol recovery from glycerol and reuse in the biodiesel production loop offsets significant energy (consumed in methanol production) and pathway emissions. Furthermore, low FERs were noted for methanol, dimethyl ether, and ammonia production from glycerol, suggesting that these processes consume more fossil energy than the amount of renewable energy recovered. However, these results will likely improve over time with improvements in soybean production and glycerol valorization processes. Nonetheless, endeavors to fabricate dimethyl ether from glycerol could reap benefits from the standpoint of assisted fuel combustion in internal combustion engines. The PtE results from ULSD-DME and biodiesel-DME show that at high engine loads, the high reactivity of dimethyl ether under low temperatures can help beat the NOx-PM tradeoff usually seen in compression-ignition engines. This opens up avenues for further experimental research to explore the possibility of utilizing DME-assisted combustion to beat the tradeoff over a wider range of loads. Finally, this effort finds that combustion models can be used to supplement experimental findings for use in WtE framework. However, caution is advised when using these models as the underlying simplifications can sometimes lead to erroneous results.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/1808/34408
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4626]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps