ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Hetal
dc.contributor.authorBiddlecome, Phil
dc.contributor.authorKildea, Megan
dc.contributor.authorDwivedi, Ruti
dc.contributor.authorSridhara, Shashank
dc.contributor.authorSilvestry, Scott
dc.contributor.authorCavarocchi, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, John L.
dc.contributor.authorVentura, Davide
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-31T15:08:30Z
dc.date.available2023-05-31T15:08:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-17
dc.identifier.citationHernandez J, Patel H, Biddlecome P, et al. Evaluation of Latex Immunoturbidimetric Assay Thresholds and HIT in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2023;29. doi: 10.1177/10760296231166370en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/34244
dc.description.abstractBackground Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common differential diagnosis in cardiothoracic surgery. The latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA) is an enhanced immunoassay that has recently been introduced for the detection of total HIT immunoglobulin and retains a higher specificity of 95% compared to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Objectives To investigate if a semiquantitative relationship exists between increasing LIA levels beyond the current positivity threshold and its correlation to positive serotonin release assay results in cardiothoracic surgery. Methods This was a multicenter, observational cohort of cardiothoracic surgery patients initiated on anticoagulation with heparin-based products. To conduct sensitivity and specificity analysis of LIA values, HIT positive was defined as a LIA value ≥1 unit/mL and HIT negative was defined as a LIA level <1 unit/mL. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to evaluate the predictive performance of the LIA. Results At manufactures’ cutoffs of ≥1.0 unit/mL, LIA sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 22%, respectively, yielding a false positive rate of 78%. At a higher cutoff of 4.5 units/mL, LIA sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 71%, respectively, yielding a false positive rate of 29% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.75 (P = .01; 95% confidence interval: 0.621-0.889). Bivalirudin was initiated in 84.6% of false positive LIA results. Conclusion This study suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of the LIA can be optimized by increasing the LIA positivity threshold. Proposing a higher LIA cutoff, may mitigate unwarranted anticoagulation and bleeding outcomes.en_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectHeparin-induced thrombocytopeniaen_US
dc.subjectImmunologyen_US
dc.subjectCardiac surgeryen_US
dc.subjectBioassayen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Latex Immunoturbidimetric Assay Thresholds and HIT in Cardiothoracic Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorHernandez, Jessica
kusw.kuauthorVentura, Davide
kusw.kudepartmentPharmacyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10760296231166370en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2378-2792en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC10123911en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © The Author(s) 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.