Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLasagna, Carly A.
dc.contributor.authorPleskac, Timothy J.
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Cynthia Z.
dc.contributor.authorMcInnis, Melvin G.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Stephan F.
dc.contributor.authorTso, Ivy F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T20:09:13Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T20:09:13Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLasagna, C. A., Pleskac, T. J., Burton, C. Z., McInnis, M. G., Taylor, S. F., & Tso, I. F. (2022). Mathematical Modeling of Risk-Taking in Bipolar Disorder: Evidence of Reduced Behavioral Consistency, With Altered Loss Aversion Specific to Those With History of Substance Use Disorder. Computational Psychiatry, 6(1), 96–116. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.61en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/33989
dc.description.abstractBipolar disorder (BD) is associated with excessive pleasure-seeking risk-taking behaviors that often characterize its clinical presentation. However, the mechanisms of risk-taking behavior are not well-understood in BD. Recent data suggest prior substance use disorder (SUD) in BD may represent certain trait-level vulnerabilities for risky behavior. This study examined the mechanisms of risk-taking and the role of SUD in BD via mathematical modeling of behavior on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Three groups—18 euthymic BD with prior SUD (BD+), 15 euthymic BD without prior SUD (BD–), and 33 healthy comparisons (HC)—completed the BART. We modeled behavior using four competing hierarchical Bayesian models, and model comparison results favored the Exponential-Weight Mean-Variance (EWMV) model, which encompasses and delineates five cognitive components of risk-taking: prior belief, learning rate, risk preference, loss aversion, and behavioral consistency. Both BD groups, regardless of SUD history, showed lower behavioral consistency than HC. BD+ exhibited more pessimistic prior beliefs (relative to BD– and HC) and reduced loss aversion (relative to HC) during risk-taking on the BART. Traditional measures of risk-taking on the BART (adjusted pumps, total points, total pops) detected no group differences. These findings suggest that reduced behavioral consistency is a crucial feature of risky decision-making in BD and that SUD history in BD may signal additional trait vulnerabilities for risky behavior even when mood symptoms and substance use are in remission. This study also underscores the value of using mathematical modeling to understand behavior in research on complex disorders like BD.en_US
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectBipolar disorderen_US
dc.subjectSubstance useen_US
dc.subjectRisk-takingen_US
dc.subjectRisk behavioren_US
dc.subjectReward processingen_US
dc.subjectExecutive functionen_US
dc.subjectComputational modelen_US
dc.subjectLoss aversionen_US
dc.subjectBehavioral consistencyen_US
dc.titleMathematical Modeling of Risk-Taking in Bipolar Disorder: Evidence of Reduced Behavioral Consistency, With Altered Loss Aversion Specific to Those With History of Substance Use Disorderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorPleskac, Timothy J.
kusw.kudepartmentPsychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/cpsy.61en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-4505en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5761-1900en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-8106en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0375-6247en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-1186en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC9897236en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2022 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).