Safeguarding human–wildlife cooperation

View/ Open
Issue Date
2022-06-09Author
van der Wal, Jessica E. M.
Spottiswoode, Claire N.
Uomini, Natalie T.
Cantor, Mauricio
Daura-Jorge, Fábio G.
Afan, Anap I.
Attwood, Mairenn C.
Amphaeris, Jenny
Balasani, Fatima
Begg, Colleen M.
Blair, Cameron J.
Bronstein, Judith L.
Buanachique, Iahaia O.
Cuthill, Rion R. T.
Das, Jewel
Deb, Apurba
Dixit, Tanmay
Dlamini, Gcina S.
Dounias, Edmond
Gedi, Isa I.
Gruber, Martin
Hoffmann, Lilian S.
Holzlehner, Tobias
Isack, Hussein A.
Laltaika, Eliupendo A.
Lloyd-Jones, David J.
Lund, Jess
Machado, Alexandre M. S.
Mahadevan, L.
Moreno, Ignacio B.
Nwaogu, Chima J.
Pereira, Valdomiro L.
Pierotti, Raymond
Rucunua, Seliano A.
dos Santos, Wilson F.
Serpa, Nathalia
Smith, Brian D.
Tolkova, Irina
Tun, Tint
Valle-Pereira, João V. S.
Wood, Brian M.
Wrangham, Richard W.
Cram, Dominic L.
Publisher
Wiley Open Access
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Rights
© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Human–wildlife cooperation occurs when humans and free-living wild animals actively coordinate their behavior to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome. These interactions provide important benefits to both the human and wildlife communities involved, have wider impacts on the local ecosystem, and represent a unique intersection of human and animal cultures. The remaining active forms are human–honeyguide and human–dolphin cooperation, but these are at risk of joining several inactive forms (including human–wolf and human–orca cooperation). Human–wildlife cooperation faces a unique set of conservation challenges, as it requires multiple components—a motivated human and wildlife partner, a suitable environment, and compatible interspecies knowledge—which face threats from ecological and cultural changes. To safeguard human–wildlife cooperation, we recommend: (i) establishing ethically sound conservation strategies together with the participating human communities; (ii) conserving opportunities for human and wildlife participation; (iii) protecting suitable environments; (iv) facilitating cultural transmission of traditional knowledge; (v) accessibly archiving Indigenous and scientific knowledge; and (vi) conducting long-term empirical studies to better understand these interactions and identify threats. Tailored safeguarding plans are therefore necessary to protect these diverse and irreplaceable interactions. Broadly, our review highlights that efforts to conserve biological and cultural diversity should carefully consider interactions between human and animal cultures.Please see AfricanHoneyguides.com/abstract-translations for Kiswahili and Portuguese translations of the abstract.
Collections
Citation
van der Wal, Jessica E M et al. “Safeguarding human-wildlife cooperation.” Conservation letters vol. 15,4 (2022): e12886. doi:10.1111/conl.12886
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.