Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGirard, M.G.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, M.P.
dc.contributor.authorH.H., Tan
dc.contributor.authorWedd, D.J.
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarty, P.
dc.contributor.authorLudt, W.B.
dc.contributor.authorSummers, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, W.L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-17T15:54:14Z
dc.date.available2022-11-17T15:54:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-21
dc.identifier.citationM G Girard, M P Davis, Tan H.H., D J Wedd, P Chakrabarty, W B Ludt, A P Summers, W L Smith, Phylogenetics of Archerfishes (Toxotidae) and Evolution of the Toxotid Shooting Apparatus, Integrative Organismal Biology, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2022, obac013, https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obac013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/33666
dc.descriptionA grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.
dc.description.abstractArcherfishes (Toxotidae) are variously found in the fresh- and brackish-water environments of Asia Pacific and are well known for their ability to shoot water at terrestrial prey. These shots of water are intended to strike their prey and cause it to fall into the water for capture and consumption. While this behavior is well known, there are competing hypotheses (blowpipe vs. pressure tank hypothesis) of how archerfishes shoot and which oral structures are involved. Current understanding of archerfish shooting structures is largely based on two species, Toxotes chatareus and T. jaculatrix. We do not know if all archerfishes possess the same oral structures to shoot water, if anatomical variation is present within these oral structures, or how these features have evolved. Additionally, there is little information on the evolution of the Toxotidae as a whole, with all previous systematic works focusing on the interrelationships of the family. We first investigate the limits of archerfish species using new and previously published genetic data. Our analyses highlight that the current taxonomy of archerfishes does not conform to the relationships we recover. Toxotes mekongensis and T. siamensis are placed in the synonymy of T. chatareus, Toxotes carpentariensis is recognized as a species and removed from the synonymy of T. chatareus, and the genus Protoxotes is recognized for T. lorentzi based on the results of our analyses. We then take an integrative approach, using a combined analysis of discrete hard- and soft-tissue morphological characters with genetic data, to construct a phylogeny of the Toxotidae. Using the resulting phylogenetic hypothesis, we then characterize the evolutionary history and anatomical variation within the archerfishes. We discuss variation in the oral structures and the evolution of the mechanism with respect to the interrelationships of archerfishes, and find that the oral structures of archerfishes support the blowpipe hypothesis but soft-tissue oral structures may also play a role in shooting. Finally, by comparing the morphology of archerfishes to their sister group, we find that the Leptobramidae has relevant shooting features in the oral cavity, suggesting that some components of the archerfish shooting mechanism are examples of co-opted or exapted traits.en_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titlePhylogenetics of Archerfishes (Toxotidae) and Evolution of the Toxotid Shooting Apparatusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorM G Girard, M. G.
kusw.kuauthorSmith, W. L.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
kusw.kudepartmentBiodiversity Instituteen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/iob/obac013en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-6808en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5349-417Xen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-8866en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-3078en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-0312en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-9699en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-9699en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-6673en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.