A health/media literacy intervention improves adults’ interpretations of sugar-sweetened beverage advertising

View/ Open
Issue Date
2020-04-28Author
Chen, Yvonnes
Porter, Kathleen J.
You, Wen
Estabrooks, Paul
Zoellner, Jamie M.
Publisher
National Association for Media Literacy Education
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Rights
© 2020 Author(s). This is an open access, peer-reviewed article published by Bepress and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Although excessive sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) intake is linked to numerous adverse health consequences, media literacy interventions rarely address the influences of food and beverage marketing with a specific focus on adults. This randomized controlled trial study investigated (1) whether media literacy education modifies adults’ perceptions of SSB advertising and (2) whether changes are moderated by health literacy. Results from the multilevel mixed-effects regression analyses with the intention-to-treat last-observation-carried-forward method showed that compared to MoveMore (a matched-contact comparison condition), SIPsmartER (an intervention condition) participants significantly enhanced their skillsets across media literacy domains (i.e., authors/audiences, messages/meanings, representation/reality) between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Baseline health literacy status did not moderate media literacy outcomes. Both low and high health literate participants improved their outcomes, suggesting that this media literacy intervention benefited adults regardless of their health literacy level. Results demonstrate the importance of cultivating critical analyses and strengthening adults’ resistance toward SSB advertising.
Collections
Citation
Chen, Y., Porter, K. J., You, W., Estabrooks, P., & Zoellner, J. M. (2020). A health/media literacy intervention improves adults’ interpretations of sugar-sweetened beverage advertising. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-1-6
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.