Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrody, Samuel Hayim
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T15:21:10Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T15:21:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBrody, Samuel Hayim. "What Great Transformation? Continuity, Rupture, and Capitalism in Twenty-First-Century Jewish Studies." Jewish Quarterly Review, vol. 110 no. 2, 2020, p. 343-372. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/jqr.2020.0012.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/33423
dc.description.abstractWhen it comes to Jewish politics and religion, contemporary scholarly trends broadly—if cautiously—favor the classic interpretation of modernity as a moment of rupture. When it comes to Jews and economics, however, continuity appears to be preferred. Taking up this disparity as it manifests in Jewish economic history and ethics, this essay argues that greater attention to the concept of capitalism would point back toward rupture, and that such a direction should be considered despite its checkered past.

Both poles of Jewish economic history’s essentialist/contextualist divide affirm Jewish economic continuity, albeit in different ways. Essentialists claim that Jews were ushered by historical circumstances into economic niches that prefigured capitalist dynamism and fluidity, while contextualists reinforce liberal ideological notions of an unchanging “economic sphere” even as they attempt to avoid grand narratives. Capitalism, for the former, is seen as having always existed in nuce, even though fettered by environmental, technological, and political factors; for the latter, capitalism is intentionally left underdetermined in order to avoid being drawn back into old debates. If, however, we consider capitalism (with Polanyi and others) a qualitative “great transformation,” both of these descriptive orientations appear problematic.

A similar problem appears in Jewish economic ethics, considered here through the example of the Oxford Handbook of Judaism and Economics. Biblical and rabbinic texts on topics defined today as “economic” are read in ways that suggest the perennial existence of contemporary categories. Taking a historical view of capitalism as a qualitatively determinate phenomenon might assist this field’s normative work.
en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pennsylvania Press (Penn Press)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Herbert D. Katz Center for Advanced Judaic Studies. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of scholarly citation, none of this work may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. For information address the University of Pennsylvania Press, 3905 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112.en_US
dc.titleWhat Great Transformation? Continuity, Rupture, and Capitalism in Twenty-First-Century Jewish Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorBrody, Samuel Hayim
kusw.kudepartmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1353/jqr.2020.0012en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record