| dc.contributor.author | Oslund, Patricia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Daicoff, Darwin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-26T18:12:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-26T18:12:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1987-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Patricia Oslund and Darwin Daicoff. Tax Structures of Kansas and Nearby States: Part 2, Hypothetical Firm Study. Institute for Public Policy and Business Research, University of Kansas. Technical Report Series: 131 (October 1987; 79 pages). | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/32913 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Total tax liabilities have been calculated for hypothetical firms in nine industries for each of six states in the region, Kansas, Colorado, Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Nebraska. Federal taxes have been included in total taxes because of state and local tax payments, which differ across regions, affect federal taxable income. The states have then been ranked according to the total taxes a firm would pay in each of the states. The study concludes that for all of the industries analyzed, Missouri firms would pay lower taxes than firms in the corresponding industries in other states in the region. This is due to a combination of low Missouri tax rates and generous enterprise zone credits. In a ranking based on all industries, Kansas places third lowest among the states. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Institute for Public Policy and Business Research, University of Kansas | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Technical Report;131 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://ipsr.ku.edu | en_US |
| dc.title | Tax Structures of Kansas and Nearby States: Part 2, Hypothetical Firm Study | en_US |
| dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
| dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-1740 | en_US |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | en_US |
