Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Aaron P.
dc.contributor.authorBeckmann, Joshua S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-01T21:52:17Z
dc.date.available2021-12-01T21:52:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-10
dc.identifier.citationSmith, A. P., & Beckmann, J. S. (2021). Quantifying value-based determinants of drug and non-drug decision dynamics. Psychopharmacology, 238(8), 2047–2057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05830-xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/32232
dc.description.abstractRationale A growing body of research suggests that substance use disorder (SUD) may be characterized as disorders of decision making. However, drug choice studies assessing drug-associated decision making often lack more complex and dynamic conditions that better approximate contexts outside the laboratory and may lead to incomplete conclusions regarding the nature of drug-associated value.

Objectives The current study assessed isomorphic (choice between identical food options) and allomorphic (choice between remifentanil [REMI] and food) choice across dynamically changing reward probabilities, magnitudes, and differentially reward-predictive stimuli in male rats to better understand determinants of drug value. Choice data were analyzed at aggregate and choice-by-choice levels using quantitative matching and reinforcement learning (RL) models, respectively.

Results Reductions in reward probability or magnitude independently reduced preferences for food and REMI commodities. Inclusion of reward-predictive cues significantly increased preference for food and REMI rewards. Model comparisons revealed that reward-predictive stimuli significantly altered the economic substitutability of food and REMI rewards at both levels of analysis. Furthermore, model comparisons supported the reformulation of reward value updating in RL models from independent terms to a shared, relative term, more akin to matching models.

Conclusions The results indicate that value-based quantitative choice models can accurately capture choice determinants within complex decision-making contexts and corroborate drug choice as a multidimensional valuation process. Collectively, the present study indicates commonalities in decision-making for drug and non-drug rewards, validates the use of economic-based SUD therapies (e.g., contingency management), and implicates the neurobehavioral processes underlying drug-associated decision-making as a potential avenue for future SUD treatment.
en_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.en_US
dc.subjectReinforcement learningen_US
dc.subjectDrugen_US
dc.subjectRaten_US
dc.subjectMatchingen_US
dc.subjectHabiten_US
dc.subjectRemifentanilen_US
dc.subjectOpioiden_US
dc.subjectChoiceen_US
dc.titleQuantifying Value-based Determinants of Drug and Non-Drug Decision Dynamicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorSmith, Aaron P.
kusw.kudepartmentPsychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00213-021-05830-xen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-0598-2926en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC8529627en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record