Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoudrias, Marie-Helene
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T18:42:25Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T18:42:25Z
dc.date.issued2007-08-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/31954
dc.descriptionDissertation (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, Neuroscience, 2007.en_US
dc.description.abstractLabeling corticospinal neurons with retrograde tracers injected in the cervical segments of the spinal cord of macaque rhesus, has revealed multiple corticospinal output zones in both the lateral and the medial aspect of the hemisphere of the frontal lobe. Seven distinct forelimb motor representations have been identified including the primary motor cortex (M1) and six secondary motor areas. These include, the supplementary motor area (SMA), the dorsal, ventral and rostral cingulate motor areas (CMAd, CMAv, and CMAr), and the dorsal and the ventral premotor areas (PMd and PMv). Extensive data on the properties of M1 have already been published, and the direct linkage of its corticospinal neurons on motoneurons has been demonstrated. While the location and distribution of the corticospinal neurons from the secondary motor areas have been described in great detail, their specific roles in limb movement and the extent of their linkage on motoneurons remain much less understood. The broad objective of this study was to characterize the motor output properties of SMA, CMAd, PMd and PMv and to compare their roles in the control of forelimb movements to those from M1. Stimulus-triggered-averaging (StTA) of electromyography (EMG) activity was used to map and characterize their output properties in terms of sign (excitatory or inhibitory), latency, strength, and distribution of effects. Our results demonstrate that effects from SMA, CMAd, PMd and PMV have longer latencies and are markedly weaker than those from M1, suggesting additional synapses in the anatomical pathway for their actions on motoneurons. Moreover, facilitation effects from SMA, CMAd, PMd and PMv did not follow the pattern of increased magnitudes of effects from proximal to distal muscles characteristic of M1. In terms of their organization, no clear segregated representations of proximal versus distal muscles were found in the secondary motor areas compared to M1, in which the existence of segregated proximal and distal muscle representations was demonstrated. Our results raise doubts about the role of the corticospinal neurons from SMA, CMAd, PMd and PMv in the direct control of forelimb motoneurons and suggest that their effects on muscular activity are most likely achieved indirectly through projections to M1 and/or to the intermediate zone of the spinal cord.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansasen_US
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.en_US
dc.subjectBiological sciencesen_US
dc.subjectCerebral cortexen_US
dc.subjectForelimben_US
dc.subjectMuscleen_US
dc.titleProperties of forelimb muscle representations in the primate cerebral cortexen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineNeuroscience
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.bibid5349237
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record