Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRashid, Mahbub
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Nayma
dc.contributor.authorJones, Belinda
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T18:24:35Z
dc.date.available2021-08-11T18:24:35Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.citationRashid, Mahbub PhD, RA; Khan, Nayma PhD; Jones, Belinda Physical and Visual Accessibilities in Intensive Care Units, Critical Care Nursing Quarterly: October/December 2016 - Volume 39 - Issue 4 - p 313-334 doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000126en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/31858
dc.descriptionThis is a non-final version of an article published in final form in: Rashid, Mahbub PhD, RA; Khan, Nayma PhD; Jones, Belinda Physical and Visual Accessibilities in Intensive Care Units, Critical Care Nursing Quarterly: October/December 2016 - Volume 39 - Issue 4 - p 313-334 doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000126en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study compared physical and visual accessibilities and their associations with staff perception and interaction behaviors in 2 intensive care units (ICUs) with open-plan and racetrack layouts. For the study, physical and visual accessibilities were measured using the spatial analysis techniques of Space Syntax. Data on staff perception were collected from 81 clinicians using a questionnaire survey. The locations of 2233 interactions, and the location and length of another 339 interactions in these units were collected using systematic field observation techniques. According to the study, physical and visual accessibilities were different in the 2 ICUs, and clinicians' primary workspaces were physically and visually more accessible in the open-plan ICU. Physical and visual accessibilities affected how well clinicians' knew their peers and where their peers were located in these units. Physical and visual accessibilities also affected clinicians' perception of interaction and communication and of teamwork and collaboration in these units. Additionally, physical and visual accessibilities showed significant positive associations with interaction behaviors in these units, with the open-plan ICU showing stronger associations. However, physical accessibilities were less important than visual accessibilities in relation to interaction behaviors in these ICUs. The implications of these findings for ICU design are discussed.en_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rights© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectIntensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectLayouten_US
dc.subjectOpen-planen_US
dc.subjectPhysical and visual accessen_US
dc.subjectRacetrack layouten_US
dc.subjectStaff interaction and teamworken_US
dc.titlePhysical and Visual Accessibilities in Intensive Care Units: A Comparative Study of Open-Plan and Racetrack Unitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorRashid, Mahbub
kusw.kudepartmentArchitecture, Design & Planningen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000126en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record