Canon Wars: A Semiotic and Ethnographic Study of a Wikipedia Talk Page Debate Concerning the Canon of Star Wars
View/ Open
Issue Date
2018-09-01Author
Thomas, Paul A.
Publisher
Intellect
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Rights
© Paul Thomas, 2018. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in The Journal of Fandom Studies, volume 6, issue 3, pages 279-300, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.6.3.279_1.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article examines how Wikipedia editors who are also members of fan communities attempt to assemble articles on the ‘canon’ (i.e. the aspects of a fictional universe that are held as official by fans) of media objects of interest. Derived largely from an ethnographic study and semiotic analysis of the Wikipedia article ‘Star Wars canon’ and its accompanying ‘talk page’, this article argues the following: first, an article’s talk page often serves as its ‘heteroglossic preconscious’, functioning as a space in which fan editors can debate conflicting versions of canon. Once a definition is agreed on, the article itself is edited to reflect the consensus, and in the process becomes a monoglossic representation of the ‘One True Canon’ in the eyes of Wikipedia fan editors. Second, authority plays a major role in the creation of articles on canon, with the sayings of the author (who is often seen in the light of a quasi-deity) being revered. Authority, however, can be shared and even subsumed by institutions, leading to disagreements as to whom the final authority really is. Third and finally, the opinions of these authors are heavily cited on talk pages to allow editors to participate in the aforementioned authority of the author, ‘win’ talk page debates, and thereby establish a Wikipedia article that details the ‘One True Canon’.
Collections
Citation
Thomas, P. A. (2018). Canon wars: A semiotic and ethnographic study of a Wikipedia talk page debate concerning the canon of Star Wars. The Journal of Fandom Studies, 6(3), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.6.3.279_1
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.