Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNiu, Qifei
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Chi
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T15:34:32Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T15:34:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01
dc.identifier.citationNiu, Q., & Zhang, C. (2019). Permeability prediction in rocks experiencing mineral precipitation and dissolution: A numerical study. Water Resources Research, 55, 3107– 3121. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024174en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/31474
dc.descriptionAn edited version of this paper was published by AGU. Copyright 2019 American Geophysical Union.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we focus on the electrical tortuosity‐based permeability model k = reff2/8F (reff is an effective pore size, and F is the formation factor) and analyze its applicability to rocks experiencing mineral precipitation and dissolution. Two limiting cases of advection‐dominated water‐rock reactions are simulated, that is, the reaction‐limited and transport‐limited cases. At the pore scale, the two precipitation/dissolution patterns are simulated with a geometrical model and a phenomenological model. The fluid and electric flows in the rocks are simulated by directly solving the linear Stokes equation and Laplace equation on the representative elementary volume of the samples. The numerical results show that evolutions of k and F differ significantly in the two limiting cases. In general, the reaction‐limited precipitation/dissolution would result in a smooth variation of k and F, which can be roughly modeled with a power function of porosity ϕ with a constant exponent. In contrast, the transport‐limited precipitation/dissolution mostly occurs near the pore throats where the fluid velocity is high. This induces a sharp change in k and F despite a minor variation in ϕ. The commonly used power laws with constant exponents are not able to describe such variations. The results also reveal that the electrical tortuosity‐based permeability prediction generally works well for rocks experiencing precipitation/dissolution if reff can be appropriately estimated, for example, with the electrical field normalized pore size Λ. The associated prediction errors are mainly due to the use of electrical tortuosity, which might be considerably larger than the true hydraulic tortuosity.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.rights© 2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.titlePermeability Prediction in Rocks Experiencing Mineral Precipitation and Dissolution: A Numerical Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorNiu, Qifei
kusw.kuauthorZhang, Chi
kusw.kudepartmentGeologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2018WR024174en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2267-6653en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-2052en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record