Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmlung, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Emma
dc.contributor.authorHolshausen, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Herry
dc.contributor.authorVedelago, Lana
dc.contributor.authorNaish, Katherine R.
dc.contributor.authorReed, Derek D.
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, Randi E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17T22:39:05Z
dc.date.available2021-02-17T22:39:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-28
dc.identifier.citationAmlung M, Marsden E, Holshausen K, et al. Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(11):1176–1186. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/31440
dc.description.abstractImportance Delay discounting is a behavioral economic index of impulsive preferences for smaller-immediate or larger-delayed rewards that is argued to be a transdiagnostic process across health conditions. Studies suggest some psychiatric disorders are associated with differences in discounting compared with controls, but null findings have also been reported.

Objective To conduct a meta-analysis of the published literature on delay discounting in people with psychiatric disorders.

Data Sources PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched through December 10, 2018. The psychiatric keywords used were based on DSM-IV or DSM-5 diagnostic categories. Collected data were analyzed from December 10, 2018, through June 1, 2019.

Study Selection Following a preregistered Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, 2 independent raters reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. English-language articles comparing monetary delay discounting between participants with psychiatric disorders and controls were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis Hedges g effect sizes were computed and random-effects models were used for all analyses. Heterogeneity statistics, one-study-removed analyses, and publication bias indices were also examined.

Main Outcomes and Measures Categorical comparisons of delay discounting between a psychiatric group and a control group.

Results The sample included 57 effect sizes from 43 studies across 8 diagnostic categories. Significantly steeper discounting for individuals with a psychiatric disorder compared with controls was observed for major depressive disorder (Hedges g = 0.37; P = .002; k = 7), schizophrenia (Hedges g = 0.46; P = .004; k = 12), borderline personality disorder (Hedges g = 0.60; P < .001; k = 8), bipolar disorder (Hedges g = 0.68; P < .001; k = 4), bulimia nervosa (Hedges g = 0.41; P = .001; k = 4), and binge-eating disorder (Hedges g = 0.34; P = .001; k = 7). In contrast, anorexia nervosa exhibited statistically significantly shallower discounting (Hedges g = –0.30; P < .001; k = 10). Modest evidence of publication bias was indicated by a statistically significant Egger test for schizophrenia and at the aggregate level across studies.

Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study appear to provide empirical support for delay discounting as a transdiagnostic process across most of the psychiatric disorders examined; the literature search also revealed limited studies in some disorders, notably posttraumatic stress disorder, which is a priority area for research.
en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Associationen_US
dc.rights© 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.titleDelay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorReed, Derek D.
kusw.kudepartmentApplied Behavioral Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record