Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBai, Yong
dc.contributor.authorPigott, Ron
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T23:11:25Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T23:11:25Z
dc.date.issued2004-10-01
dc.identifier.citationBai, Y. and Pigott, R., “Assessing Outcomes Using Program Assessment Portfolio Approach,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 4, October 2004, Page 246-254.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/31340
dc.description.abstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology has developed and implemented new criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs in the United States. The new criteria, Technology Criteria 2000 (TC2K), have changed the way that engineering technology programs conduct their business. In order to survive in the future, each program has to develop a strategy to meet the new requirements specified in the TC2K. The Department of Engineering Technology at Texas Tech University has developed a program assessment portfolio (PAP) to assess the department performance toward the attainment of TC2K Criterion 1. This paper presents 12 assessment methods within the PAP. Particularly, it demonstrates how to develop and implement one of the assessment methods, pre- and postcourse assessment, to a senior-level course. Data collected from the implementation has been analyzed and results indicate that pre- and postcourse assessment provide valuable information regarding student learning. Furthermore, the information can be used to continue improving effectiveness of teaching.en_US
dc.publisherASTM Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2004 ASCE.en_US
dc.subjectAccreditationen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectEngineering educationen_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.subjectCurriculaen_US
dc.subjectUniversitiesen_US
dc.titleAssessing Outcomes Using Program Assessment Portfolio Approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorBai, Yong
kusw.kudepartmentCivil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineeringen_US
kusw.oastatusna
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:4(246)en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record