Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPunt, Stephanie E.
dc.contributor.authorKurz, Daniel L.
dc.contributor.authorBefort, Christie A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T20:38:23Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T20:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-11
dc.identifier.citationPunt, S. E., Kurz, D. L., & Befort, C. A. (2020). Recruitment of Men Into a Pragmatic Rural Primary Care Weight Loss Trial. American journal of men's health, 14(6), 1557988320971917. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320971917en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/30965
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
dc.description.abstractMen remain underrepresented in behavioral weight loss trials and are more difficult to recruit compared to women. We describe recruitment response of men and women into a mixed-gender behavioral weight loss trial conducted within 36 rural primary care clinics. Participants were recruited through primary care clinics via direct mailings (n = 15,076) and in-clinic referrals by their primary care provider (PCP). Gender differences were examined in response rate to direct mailings, study referral source, and rates of proceeding to study screening, being eligible, and enrolling. Men had a lower response rate to direct mailings than women (7.8% vs. 17.7%, p < .001). Men (vs. women) responding to the mailing were more likely to respond by opt-in postcard (64.6% vs. 56.8%) and less likely to respond by phone (33.9% vs. 39.6%), p = .002. Among potential participants contacting the study (n = 2413), men were less likely to report being referred by PCPs (15.2% vs. 21.6%; p < .001), but were just as likely to proceed to screening, be eligible, and enroll. Men and women were more likely to proceed to screening when referred by PCPs (93.3% vs. 95.4%) compared to direct mailings (74.2% vs. 73.9%). Enrolled men were older (p < .001), more likely to be married (p = .04), and had higher levels of education (p = .01). Men were less likely than women to respond to direct mailings and to be referred by their PCP, but after contacting the study, had similar screening, eligibility, and enrollment rates. Encouraging and training providers to refer men during clinic visits may help recruit more men into primary care-based weight loss trials.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPatient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (OTO-1402-09413)en_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectRecruitmenten_US
dc.subjectRecruitment responseen_US
dc.subjectMenen_US
dc.subjectBehavioral weight lossen_US
dc.titleRecruitment of Men Into a Pragmatic Rural Primary Care Weight Loss Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorPunt, Stephanie E.
kusw.kudepartmentPsychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1557988320971917en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3303-5296en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC7673057en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2020
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © The Author(s) 2020