Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Andrea P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T15:14:51Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T15:14:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSocial Thought and Research, Volume 35 (2019), pp. 79-112.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/30811
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I review, analyze, and evaluate the myriad ways early canonical and more recent high-profile scholarship in the field of sexualities envision a liberatory sexual politics and the most fruitful modes of achieving it. Due to theorists’ diverging interpretations of the causes and forms of sexual oppression as well as their differing visions of liberated sexuality, I find that prescriptions for dismantling the “ethnosexual regime” (Nagel 2000) vary widely. The strategies suggested by scholars can be categorized into: 1) radical lesbian-feminist separatism, 2) identity politics, 3) the redeployment of gender, which encompasses trans and intersex bodies, gender play (e.g., butch-femme, drag, and shifting constructions of masculinity), and non-binary identities, 4) micro-level individual and interpersonal solutions, 5) changes in educational institutions, and 6) sexualities research itself. I conclude by making suggestions for sociologists who seek to further theorize and effect the subversion of normative systems of sexuality.en_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansasen_US
dc.titleStrategies for Sexual Subversion: Informing the Future of Sexualities Research and Activismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/1808.30811
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record