Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHill, Michael A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-08T20:57:30Z
dc.date.available2020-07-08T20:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01
dc.identifier.citationMichael A. Hill, “A Question of Treason? Confederate Generals and U.S. Army Post Names,” The Journal of America’s Military Past 44, no. 1 (Winter 2019): 28-47.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/30569
dc.description.abstractThe naming of U.S. Army posts after Confederate generals is vital in understanding the process of reconciliation after the Civil War. The honoring of Confederate generals in such a manner was made attractive not only by a desire for sectional reconciliation, but by an understanding of the Civil War shaped by the Lost Cause. In choosing to name Army posts after those some might considered traitors, U.S. Armyleaders not only reflected national attitudes toward the Civil War, but shaped that attitude as well. Additionally, one must ask how the continued memorial to the Confederate cause as illustrated in U.S. Army installation names continues to influence the perception of Americans in regard to the Civil War, why it was fought, and what it achieved.en_US
dc.publisherCouncil on America's Military Pasten_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://campjamp.org/publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2019, Council on America's Military Pasten_US
dc.subjectAmerican Civil Waren_US
dc.subjectMilitary Historyen_US
dc.subjectLost Causeen_US
dc.titleA Question of Treason? Confederate Generals and U.S. Army Post Namesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record