Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTuschhoff, E. J.
dc.contributor.authorHutter, Carl R.
dc.contributor.authorGlor, Richard E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-16T18:50:26Z
dc.date.available2020-06-16T18:50:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-13
dc.identifier.citationTuschhoff, E. J., Hutter, C. R., & Glor, R. E. (2020). Improving sustainable use of genetic resources in biodiversity archives. PeerJ, 8, e8369. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8369en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/30511
dc.descriptionThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.description.abstractTissue sample databases housed in biodiversity archives represent a vast trove of genetic resources, and these tissues are often destructively subsampled and provided to researchers for DNA extractions and subsequent sequencing. While obtaining a sufficient quantity of DNA for downstream applications is vital for these researchers, it is also important to preserve tissue resources for future use given that the original material is destructively and consumptively sampled with each use. It is therefore necessary to develop standardized tissue subsampling and loaning procedures to ensure that tissues are being used efficiently. In this study, we specifically focus on the efficiency of DNA extraction methods by using anuran liver and muscle tissues maintained at a biodiversity archive. We conducted a series of experiments to test whether current practices involving coarse visual assessments of tissue size are effective, how tissue mass correlates with DNA yield and concentration, and whether the amount of DNA recovered is correlated with sample age. We found that tissue samples between 2 and 8 mg resulted in the most efficient extractions, with tissues at the lower end of this range providing more DNA per unit mass and tissues at the higher end of this range providing more total DNA. Additionally, we found no correlation between tissue age and DNA yield. Because we find that even very small tissue subsamples tend to yield far more DNA than is required by researchers for modern sequencing applications (including whole genome shotgun sequencing), we recommend that biodiversity archives consider dramatically improving sustainable use of their archived material by providing researchers with set quantities of extracted DNA rather than with the subsampled tissues themselves.en_US
dc.publisherPeerJen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2020 Tuschhoff et al.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectTissue samplingen_US
dc.subjectGenetic resourcesen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectHerpetologyen_US
dc.subjectBiological collectionsen_US
dc.subjectDNA extractionen_US
dc.titleImproving sustainable use of genetic resources in biodiversity archivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorTuschhoff, E. J.
kusw.kuauthorHutter, Carl R.
kusw.kuauthorGlor, Richard E.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
kusw.kudepartmentBiodiversity Instituteen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.8369en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC7024571en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2020 Tuschhoff et al.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Copyright 2020 Tuschhoff et al.