ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUnderwood, Ted
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T20:51:12Z
dc.date.available2020-05-28T20:51:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/30392
dc.descriptionBeyond tools: the questions about interpretation that link computer science to the humanitiesDigital Humanities Seminar, University of Kansas. Institute for Digital Research in the Humanities & Hall Center for the Humanities. March 31, 2014: http://idrh.ku.edu

Ted Underwood is at the University of Ilinois.
en_US
dc.description.abstractThe term “digital humanities” tends to stage contemporary developments in the humanities as a confrontation, not with specific ideas or disciplines, but with digital technology itself. That’s part of the logic of the term’s success, but for good or ill, this talk will aim at a narrower, socially concrete topic. I’m interested, not in the web or in computers as such, but in the human beings who study computer science. To the extent that humanists discuss CS at all, we tend to imagine it as a narrowly instrumental discourse. And there’s some truth to that: a large part of what I want to do is show off some neat tricks computer scientists have invented that turn out to be useful for the humanities (and especially for literary history). I’ll focus on topic modeling (which casts new light on the history of humanistic disciplines), and on supervised learning algorithms (which provide an interestingly flexible way to approach the history of genre). But I also want to suggest that the conversation between computer scientists and humanists needn’t be purely instrumental, or fully contained in “tools” that we borrow from CS. In some ways computer science is a surprisingly flexible hermeneutic discourse, and humanists may have more in common with it than we imagine.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://youtu.be/JjnXciUAdV0en_US
dc.subjectDigital Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectTopoic Modelingen_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectLiteratureen_US
dc.subjectText Miningen_US
dc.subjectHathiTrusten_US
dc.titleBeyond Tools: Linking Computer Science to the Humanitiesen_US
dc.typeVideoen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Video

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record