Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeeks, Elijah
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T20:41:01Z
dc.date.available2020-05-18T20:41:01Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/30361
dc.descriptionGenealogy, Bureaucracy, Correspondence, Transportation—Networks and Network Analysis Methods in Humanities. Digital Humanities Seminar, University of Kansas—Institute for Digital Research in the Humanities & Hall Center for the Humanities, March 5, 2013: http://idrh.ku.edu

Elijah Meeks is with Stanford University Library.
en_US
dc.description.abstractNetwork analysis in the sciences and social sciences typically focuses on citation, social, communication, logical, and neurological networks, and a broad set of methods and research has developed along those lines. However, network analysis in the humanities has grown in visibility and popularity recently and focuses instead on similar but distinct forms that have their own methodological concerns. The role of evidence and agency, for instance, distinguish them from traditional, big data and API driven research on telecommunications and social networking services. This talk will focus on four distinct humanities network types: Genealogical networks of British cultural elites and their families, correspondence networks from the Republic of Letters, transportation networks of Imperial Rome, and Bureaucratic networks from medieval China. The application and adaptation of established network analysis methods will be demonstrated, along with an exploration of methodological problems and techniques for addressing them in humanities network analysis.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://youtu.be/y-KFJO_KIFQen_US
dc.subjectDigitalen_US
dc.subjectHumanitiesen_US
dc.subjectGephien_US
dc.subjectNetwork Analysisen_US
dc.titleNetworks and Network Analysis Methods in Humanitiesen_US
dc.typeVideoen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Video

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record