Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Peggy L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-19T00:01:04Z
dc.date.available2019-12-19T00:01:04Z
dc.date.issued1984-05-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/29863
dc.descriptionPh. D. University of Kansas, Educational Policy and Administration 1984en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study reviewed ten major Precision Teaching programs to discover factors contributing to the success or failure of the programs.

Telephone interviews were conducted with project directors of both active and inactive programs to determine past and current practices. An implementation survey was sent to active programs to determine the number of teachers using Precision Teaching and number of years per teacher.

Four of the ten programs are inactive; six are active, five increasing in use while one is at the maximum level of use, with all schools, teachers, and students using Precision Teaching.

Administrative support, integration into the local district program, and local funding were found necessary for continuation of successful programs. Different funding sources or amounts do not affect the success of a program.

Change of central administration philosophy, termination of director's position, and termination of funding were found to be related to discontinuance of programs.

Precision Teaching is being used across all grade levels and in most content and basic skill areas, in both regular and special education.
en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansasen_US
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.en_US
dc.titleSummary of ten major school precision teaching programsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineEducational Policy and Administration
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.bibid932896
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record