The State of Theory in LGBTQ Aging: Implications for Gerontological Scholarship
View/ Open
Issue Date
2019-01-09Author
Fabbre, Vanessa D.
Jen, Sarah
Fredriksen-Goldsen, Karen
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript
Rights
Copyright The Author(s) 2019
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Social research in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) aging is a rapidly growing field, but an examination of the use of theory has not yet been conducted for its impact on the field’s direction. We conducted a systematic review of empirical articles published in LGBTQ aging in the years 2009–2017 (N = 102). Using a typology of theory use in scholarly articles, we analyzed these articles for the types of theories being used, the degree to which theories were used in each article, and the analytical function they served. We found that 52% of articles consistently applied theory, 23% implied or partially applied theory, and 25% presented as atheoretical. A wide range of theories were used and served multiple analytical functions such as concept development and explanation of findings. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of theory use in this body of literature, especially with respect to implications for future knowledge development in the field.
Collections
Citation
Fabbre, V. D., Jen, S., & Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. (2019). The State of Theory in LGBTQ Aging: Implications for Gerontological Scholarship. Research on aging, 41(5), 495–518. doi:10.1177/0164027518822814
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.