ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Argumentative Competence in Friend and Stranger Dyadic Exchanges
dc.contributor.author | Cionea, Ioana A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Piercy, Cameron W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bostwick, Eryn N. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-27T21:10:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-27T21:10:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cionea, I.A., Piercy, C.W., Bostwick, E.N. et al. Argumentation (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09487-x | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/29450 | |
dc.description | This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Argumentation. The final version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09487-x . | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This manuscript investigates the role of argumentative competence in interpersonal dyadic exchanges. Specifically, this study examined the two sub-dimensions of competence, argumentative effectiveness and appropriateness, and their connections with argumentative traits, situational features, and argument satisfaction. In addition, self-perceived versus observed argumentative competence were compared. Participants in the study (N = 282, 141 dyads) completed measures before and after a face-to-face argumentative discussion with another person about one of two possible topics (student athlete pay and texting while driving). Results revealed that argumentation traits had little effect on argumentative competence, but competence was predicted by one’s knowledge about the topic. Argument satisfaction depended only on arguers’ own competence, not their partners’. Finally, a perceptual bias existed regarding argument effectiveness (but not appropriateness) in that participants rated themselves higher than did observers. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.rights | © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 | en_US |
dc.subject | Argumentative competence | en_US |
dc.subject | Argumentation traits | en_US |
dc.subject | Actor–partner interdependence model | en_US |
dc.subject | Argument satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-perception bias | en_US |
dc.title | Argumentative Competence in Friend and Stranger Dyadic Exchanges | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Piercy, Cameron W. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Communication Studies | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10503-019-09487-x | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1431-3086 | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | en_US |