ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCho, Hyesun
dc.contributor.authorMortenson, Leah Marie
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-18T20:39:44Z
dc.date.available2019-05-18T20:39:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-31
dc.date.submitted2018
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16256
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/28029
dc.description.abstractThis study responds to a gap identified in the literature regarding the discussion of social justice issues including racism in the field of Teaching English to Speakers of other Languages or TESOL (Cho, 2016; Guerrettaz & Zahler, 2017; Kubota & Lin, 2006) and the ways in which ESOL instructors both conceive of Social Justice Pedagogy (SJP) and engage with topics such as the impact of discrimination based on race, gender, sexuality, class, privilege, and language on individuals’ experiences and opportunities. This study followed three white university ESOL instructors in an EAP program in a major metropolitan area on the East Coast and sought to answer the following questions: How do these instructors conceive of Social Justice Pedagogy? In what ways does their “whiteness” enter into the classroom when discussing racial and social justice issues? What practical lessons that can be gleaned from these instructors’ practices for TESOL educators who seek to engage in SJP? This semester-long qualitative study employed classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with teachers and students, and document review of syllabi, assignments, and classroom resources. A holistic framework integrating DiAngelo’s (2018) concept of white fragility, Kelly’s (1986) orientations towards teacher neutrality, and Banks’ (2004a) conception of democratic education shed light on instructors’ positions towards SJP and their impact on the classroom interactions that occurred. Findings highlight that instructors’ assumptions about teacher neutrality and what comprises a democratic education influenced their teaching about and for social justice concerns. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
dc.format.extent266 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectEnglish as a second language
dc.subjectCritical Pedagogy
dc.subjectEAP
dc.subjectSocial Justice Pedagogy
dc.subjectTeacher Neutrality
dc.subjectTESOL
dc.subjectWhite Fragility
dc.titleIntegrating Social Justice Curricula into English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Instruction
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberHallman, Heidi
dc.contributor.cmtememberFrey, Bruce
dc.contributor.cmtememberMarkham, Paul
dc.contributor.cmtememberRury, John
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineCurriculum and Teaching
dc.thesis.degreeLevelEd.D.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record