Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTemplin, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorQin, Lu
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-18T20:33:23Z
dc.date.available2019-05-18T20:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-31
dc.date.submitted2018
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:16279
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/28025
dc.description.abstractThe Bayesian parametric and semiparametric approaches are compared to recover the polynomial and nonpolynomial relationships among latent factors in the structural equation model (SEM). In earlier studies, the semiparametric approach has been demonstrated to be a more advanced approach to estimate the nonnormally distributed densities. However, its performance in recovering nonlinearity among factors has not been widely studied. The objectives of this dissertation are (1) to compare the recovery performances between the parametric and semiparametric approaches in capturing the polynomial and nonpolynomial relationships among latent factors in the structural model and (2) to investigate the recovery performance of the semiparametric approach in capturing the nonpolynomial relationships when the polynomial function is misspecified. The Bayesian semiparametric approach is applied using the truncated Dirichlet process with a stick-breaking prior to track the nonlinearity under different combinations of nonlinear functions (e.g., exponential, logarithmic, and sine) in the simulation study. Several important results were revealed. First, in study 1, both the parametric and semiparametric approaches achieved good convergence rates under the exponential and sine conditions. The polynomial conditions had greater difficulty in convergence due to the quadratic and interaction effects. Second, regarding the nonlinearity recoveries, the parametric approach performed similarly to the semiparametric approach at large truncation levels (200) in recovering the polynomial nonlinearity. The semiparametric approach had better recovery of nonpolynomial nonlinearity than the parametric approach. Third, in study 2, the semiparametric approach had a fairly good convergence rate at truncation level 5 under the exponential and sine conditions. Fourth, the semiparametric approach barely recovered the nonpolynomial nonlinearity with a misspecified polynomial function. A large truncation level did not improve the recovery performance when a nonlinear function is incorrectly presumed. The results implied that when latent factors or data is normally distributed, parametric approach is sufficient to provide an accurate recovery of nonlinear relationships among latent factors. However, when latent factors or data is non-normally distributed, the semiparametric approach provides more accurate estimations and a higher accuracy in capturing nonlinear relationships among latent factors. Considering the capacity of computer memory and running time, a small truncation level is suggested to capture the polynomial and nonpolynomial nonlinearity.
dc.format.extent80 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectEducational psychology
dc.subjectnonlinear relationship
dc.subjectparametric approach
dc.subjectsemiparametric approach
dc.titleComparing Bayesian parametric and semiparametric estimation of nonlinear relationships in structural equation models with ordinal data
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberFrey, Bruce
dc.contributor.cmtememberHansen, David
dc.contributor.cmtememberHoffman, Lesa
dc.contributor.cmtememberJohnson, Paul
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePsychology & Research in Education
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record