KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An ERP investigation of individual differences in the processing of wh-dependencies by native and non-native speakers

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Covey_ku_0099D_16096_DATA_1.pdf (3.306Mb)
    Issue Date
    2018-08-31
    Author
    Covey, Lauren
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    191 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Linguistics
    Rights
    Copyright held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study examines the processing of wh-dependencies by native English speakers and Mandarin Chinese-speaking learners of English. Wh-dependencies involve a long-distance relationship between a fronted wh-word (e.g., who) and the position in the sentence where it originated, called a gap site. The examination of wh-dependency resolution presents an interesting test case for whether or not grammatical knowledge is used online because, in languages such as English, wh-movement is constrained such that extraction is only possible from certain positions and is barred from other positions, called islands (Ross, 1967). In examining whether native speakers and second language (L2) learners are sensitive to island constraints online, this study tests predictions of prominent L2 processing theories which argue that adult learners are unable to utilize abstract grammatical information during processing (e.g., Clahsen & Felser, 2006). In the native literature, the processing of wh-dependencies has been proposed to involve at least two distinct processes, a predictive process in which the parser searches for a potential gap site, and an integrative process, when the dependency is successfully resolved at the gap site. The broader electrophysiological literature has linked these qualitatively different processes to distinct event-related potential (ERP) components: the N400 for prediction (e.g., Federmeier, 2007; Lau et al., 2008; 2013; Michel, 2014; Van Berkum et al., 2005), and the P600 for syntactic integration (e.g., Gouvea et al., 2010; Kaan et al., 2000; Phillips et al., 2005). Although previous ERP studies have examined these components independently, few studies have tracked the dynamics of wh-dependency resolution across the sentence, examining both prediction and integration to investigate whether these processes are indexed by unique components. The present study takes this approach, focusing on the processing of wh-dependencies at three critical regions across the sentence, two of which are associated with prediction, and one with integration. This study additionally investigates the extent to which the use of grammatical knowledge during online processing and the ability to engage in predictive processing is modulated by proficiency in L2 learners, and performance on a range of cognitive measures in native speakers. Results show that both native speakers and highly proficient learners engage in gap prediction during processing, although this is limited to certain contexts for learners. In examining processing inside of an island, a position from which extraction is prohibited, the current study shows that native speakers and highly proficient learners are guided by grammatical knowledge. Finally, both natives and learners show evidence of successful dependency resolution at the actual gap site, even in sentences with islands. Overall, the results present a complex picture of processing wh-dependencies by native English speakers and Mandarin-speaking learners of English, showing that while both native speakers and learners with higher proficiency are able to use grammatical information during online processing, the contexts in which L2 learners are able to predict differ from native speakers.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27993
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4475]
    • Linguistics Dissertations and Theses [95]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps