Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorScioli, Emma
dc.contributor.advisorGordon, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorFons, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-12T19:06:05Z
dc.date.available2019-05-12T19:06:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-31
dc.date.submitted2018
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/27916
dc.description.abstractThis thesis focuses on the character of Medea, analyzing her ability to adapt her rhetoric across genre and time period. Specifically, I will look at Medea’s speech through three lenses—dialogue, epistle, and monologue—each represented by one of three authors: Euripides, Ovid, and Seneca. By exploring how the constraints of genre influence the way in which Medea speaks and the ways in which she can interact with her intended audience, and invariably how that interaction shapes our own understanding of her character, this thesis explores how Medea manipulates her story so that she appears in a more favorable light to her intended audience in spite of her bloody history.
dc.format.extent93 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectClassical literature
dc.subjectClassical studies
dc.subjectRhetoric
dc.subjectEuripides
dc.subjectintertextual
dc.subjectMedea
dc.subjectOvid
dc.subjectRhetoric
dc.subjectSeneca
dc.titleSubtle Manipulation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Medea Across Time and Genre in Greek and Roman Literature
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberScioli, Emma
dc.contributor.cmtememberGordon, Pamela
dc.contributor.cmtememberWelch, Tara
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineClassics
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.A.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record