ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStölzel, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorAllred, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-26T21:12:00Z
dc.date.available2018-10-26T21:12:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-31
dc.date.submitted2018
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15945
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/27101
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to provide performance analyses for Kalevi Aho’s Solo III, Philippe Hurel’s Loops I, and Toshi Ichiyanagi’s In a Living Memory. These unaccompanied contemporary flute pieces are commonly asked for in major flute competitions, but there is little scholarly research available for performers preparing to compete in these competitions. This is in direct contrast to Luciano Berio’s Sequenza I, which is also commonly required for competitions but has a number of resources by flutists and theorists. Because the Sequenza predates Solo III, Loops I, and In a Living Memory by over thirty years, many defining characteristics of the later pieces can be traced back, in part, to similar material in the Berio. By examining the existing research on learning and performing Berio’s Sequenza I, I have informed my own work on the subsequent pieces. Just as the Aho, Hurel, and Ichiyanagi demonstrate influence from the Berio, my methodology is modeled after these existing performance analyses of Sequenza I. Throughout this paper, my analysis of each composition will address rhythmic complexity, extended techniques, form and phrasing, and the organization of pitch. Stripping away these layers of difficulty can help a flutist approach each piece more systematically and more fully understand the individual aesthetic and use of dramatic devices, preparing flutists to handle the demands in Solo III, Loops I, and In a Living Memory.
dc.format.extent39 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectMusic
dc.subjectAnalysis
dc.subjectContemporary
dc.subjectFlute
dc.subjectGuide
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.titleContemporary Solo Works in the Modern Flute Competition: Performance Analyses of Aho’s Solo III, Hurel’s Loops I, and Ichiyanagi’s In a Living Memory
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberHayes, Michelle
dc.contributor.cmtememberPierce, Forrest
dc.contributor.cmtememberPopiel, Paul
dc.contributor.cmtememberStomberg, Eric
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineMusic
dc.thesis.degreeLevelD.M.A.
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-0847
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record