Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHaider-Markel, Donald P.
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Bronson
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-24T19:47:59Z
dc.date.available2018-10-24T19:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-31
dc.date.submitted2017
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15703
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/26991
dc.description.abstractWe know a lot about the underlying characteristics which effect the causal attributions individuals make. The current literature emphasizes the effect partisanship has on whether people make internal or external attributions. However, most of this literature ignores individual differences within parties. As such, the literature finds that Democrats are more likely to give external attributions while Republicans are driven by internal ones. Most argue that this partisan distinction leads to differing policy positions. This paper uses logistic regression on national survey data to show how political knowledge changes the likelihood of partisan attributional belief. The more knowledgeable partisans are, the more likely they are to make casual attributions which reinforce their policy preferences.
dc.format.extent22 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectAttribution theory
dc.subjectMass Shootings
dc.subjectPublic Opinion
dc.titleAttributional Differences Amongst the Politically Knowledgeable: How Political Knowledge Impacts the Causal Determination of Mass Shootings
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberJoslyn, Mark
dc.contributor.cmtememberMiller, Patrick
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePolitical Science
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.A.
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0768-3644
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record