| dc.description.abstract | It has been suggested that media coverage of Michelle Obama during the months
leading up to the November 2008 US Presidential election in which her husband Barack
Obama was a candidate, was at times unfair and biased, occasionally negative and in bad
taste, and a few times arguably racist, stereotypic, and attacking in nature (The Capital
Times, June 21, 2008).
Those who express these ideas often cite systemic American racism and racial
ideology as the cause of such press, citing as examples the July 21, 2008 cover of The New
Yorker (in which Michelle and Barack Obama are featured in stereotypically charged
images) and Fox News Channel’s use of the racially-loaded phrase “Baby Mama” to refer
to Ms. Obama (June 11, 2008). Others suggest Michelle Obama herself is the cause of
such negative press, referring to her February 2008 Wisconsin stump speech (a speech
which raised questions about her “pride” in America), her active participation in her
husband’s campaign, and her off-the-cuff remarks in interviews describing her husband’s
personal habits. Still others posit that when wives of political candidates take an active
role in their husbands’ campaigns, they are “fair game” for negative critique and scrutiny
(USA Today, May 20, 2008).
Perhaps all three factors played a role in the media’s attempt to shape, construct and
engage the national discourse around Michelle Obama and the possibility of her becoming
First Lady of the United States of America. This paper sets out to examine some of the
discourse in US newspapers during the last 10 months of the 2008 US Presidential election
to determine whether coverage was indeed biased, negative and attacking, as some have
suggested. | en_US |
