Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcClure, Kirk
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T16:16:26Z
dc.date.available2018-06-22T16:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationMcClure, K. (2001). The Twin Mandates Given to the GSEs: Which Works Best, Helping Low-Income Homebuyers or Helping Underserved Areas? Cityscape, 5(3), 107-143.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/26567
dc.description.abstractThis research examines the twin mandates of the GSE Act of 1992: to direct mortgage credit to neighborhoods that have been underserved by mortgage lenders and to direct mortgage credit to low-income and minority households. Using the Kansas City metropolitan area as a test site, data from the GSEs have been compared with non-GSE mortgage lenders to determine the performance of the GSEs in meeting these two objectives. This research finds that the GSEs have not performed as well as the conventional lenders. Independent of the use of the secondary mortgage market, borrowers are better served if credit is directed to them independent of location. The alternative approach of directing credit to underserved areas is helpful only insofar as it helps to direct credit to neighborhoods that are marginally less desirable than the neighborhoods deemed to be well served.en_US
dc.publisherOffice of Policy Development and Research of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol5num3/index.htmlen_US
dc.titleThe Twin Mandates Given to the GSEs: Which Works Best, Helping Low-Income Homebuyers or Helping Underserved Areas?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorMcClure, Kirk
kusw.kudepartmentUrban Planningen_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record