Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrumberg, Jonathan S.
dc.contributor.authorGuenther, Frank H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-14T16:46:16Z
dc.date.available2018-06-14T16:46:16Z
dc.date.issued2010-09
dc.identifier.citationBrumberg, J. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2010). Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 7(5), 667–679. http://doi.org/10.1586/erd.10.34en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/26514
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Medical Devices on September, 2010, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1586/erd.10.34.en_US
dc.description.abstractBrain–computer interfaces (BCIs) have been developed over the past decade to restore communication to persons with severe paralysis. In the most severe cases of paralysis, known as locked-in syndrome, patients retain cognition and sensation, but are capable of only slight voluntary eye movements. For these patients, no standard communication method is available, although some can use BCIs to communicate by selecting letters or words on a computer. Recent research has sought to improve on existing techniques by using BCIs to create a direct prediction of speech utterances rather than to simply control a spelling device. Such methods are the first steps towards speech prostheses as they are intended to entirely replace the vocal apparatus of paralyzed users. This article outlines many well known methods for restoration of communication by BCI and illustrates the difference between spelling devices and direct speech prediction or speech prosthesis.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectBrain–computer interfaceen_US
dc.subjectSpeech prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectSpeech synthesisen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of speech prostheses: current status and recent advancesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorBrumberg, Jonathan S.
kusw.kudepartmentSpeech-Language-Hearingen_US
kusw.oanotesPer SHERPA/RoMEO 6/14/2018:thor's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) Author's Post-print: green tick author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF General Conditions:

Some individual journals may have policies prohibiting pre-print archiving On author's personal website or departmental website immediately On institutional repository, subject-based repository or academic social network (Mendeley, ResearchGate or Academia.edu) after 12 months embargo Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used On a non-profit server Published source must be acknowledged Must link to publisher version Set statements to accompany deposits (see policy) The publisher will deposit in on behalf of authors to a designated institutional repository including PubMed Central, where a deposit agreement exists with the repository Publisher will automatically deposit articles in PubMed Central for Wellcome Trust authors after 6 months embargo Publisher will automatically deposit articles in PubMed Central for NIH authors after 12 months embargo
en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1586/erd.10.34en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record