ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances
dc.contributor.author | Brumberg, Jonathan S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guenther, Frank H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-14T16:46:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-14T16:46:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brumberg, J. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2010). Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 7(5), 667–679. http://doi.org/10.1586/erd.10.34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/26514 | |
dc.description | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Medical Devices on September, 2010, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1586/erd.10.34. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) have been developed over the past decade to restore communication to persons with severe paralysis. In the most severe cases of paralysis, known as locked-in syndrome, patients retain cognition and sensation, but are capable of only slight voluntary eye movements. For these patients, no standard communication method is available, although some can use BCIs to communicate by selecting letters or words on a computer. Recent research has sought to improve on existing techniques by using BCIs to create a direct prediction of speech utterances rather than to simply control a spelling device. Such methods are the first steps towards speech prostheses as they are intended to entirely replace the vocal apparatus of paralyzed users. This article outlines many well known methods for restoration of communication by BCI and illustrates the difference between spelling devices and direct speech prediction or speech prosthesis. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.subject | Brain–computer interface | en_US |
dc.subject | Speech prosthesis | en_US |
dc.subject | Speech synthesis | en_US |
dc.title | Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Brumberg, Jonathan S. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Speech-Language-Hearing | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1586/erd.10.34 | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | en_US |