dc.contributor.author | Brumberg, Jonathan S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guenther, Frank H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-14T16:46:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-14T16:46:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brumberg, J. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2010). Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 7(5), 667–679. http://doi.org/10.1586/erd.10.34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/26514 | |
dc.description | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Medical Devices on September, 2010, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1586/erd.10.34. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) have been developed over the past decade to restore communication to persons with severe paralysis. In the most severe cases of paralysis, known as locked-in syndrome, patients retain cognition and sensation, but are capable of only slight voluntary eye movements. For these patients, no standard communication method is available, although some can use BCIs to communicate by selecting letters or words on a computer. Recent research has sought to improve on existing techniques by using BCIs to create a direct prediction of speech utterances rather than to simply control a spelling device. Such methods are the first steps towards speech prostheses as they are intended to entirely replace the vocal apparatus of paralyzed users. This article outlines many well known methods for restoration of communication by BCI and illustrates the difference between spelling devices and direct speech prediction or speech prosthesis. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.subject | Brain–computer interface | en_US |
dc.subject | Speech prosthesis | en_US |
dc.subject | Speech synthesis | en_US |
dc.title | Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Brumberg, Jonathan S. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Speech-Language-Hearing | en_US |
kusw.oanotes | Per SHERPA/RoMEO 6/14/2018:thor's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
Author's Post-print: green tick author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing)
Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF
General Conditions: Some individual journals may have policies prohibiting pre-print archiving
On author's personal website or departmental website immediately
On institutional repository, subject-based repository or academic social network (Mendeley, ResearchGate or Academia.edu) after 12 months embargo
Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
On a non-profit server
Published source must be acknowledged
Must link to publisher version
Set statements to accompany deposits (see policy)
The publisher will deposit in on behalf of authors to a designated institutional repository including PubMed Central, where a deposit agreement exists with the repository
Publisher will automatically deposit articles in PubMed Central for Wellcome Trust authors after 6 months embargo
Publisher will automatically deposit articles in PubMed Central for NIH authors after 12 months embargo | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1586/erd.10.34 | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | en_US |