Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLane, Kathleen L.
dc.contributor.authorRoyer, David James
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T21:11:41Z
dc.date.available2018-03-09T21:11:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-31
dc.date.submitted2017
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:15518
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/26113
dc.description.abstractTo best support all students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs, an integrated systems approach is necessary. In such systems, all faculty and staff ideally recognize student success is a shared responsibility and collaborate in a data-informed process to define common student behavioral expectations to facilitate success academically, behaviorally, and socially. By defining behavioral expectations, clarity is provided for all students regardless of skill set, allowing equitable access to all areas of instruction. In this dissertation, Chapter 1 frames the need for clearly defined student expectations within three-tiered models of support for both instructional and non-instructional settings. Chapter 2 reviews the literature and determined most schools in published studies used a leadership team to build expectation matrices, sometimes obtained faculty and staff feedback, and rarely used a data-informed decision making process including faculty and staff input. Chapter 3 and 4 explore educator priorities of behavioral expectations in classroom and non-instructional settings—a previously unstudied area of inquiry—for students as measured by the Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings (SESSS; Lane, Oakes, & Menzies, 2010). Data are analyzed from a cohort of 10 schools that participated in a year-long comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T; Lane, Oakes, & Menzies, 2014) model of prevention professional learning series. Results indicated educators across school levels (elementary, middle, high) had similar views on what skills should be prioritized for student success, with significant differences found for the hallway setting. Additionally, participant gender and professional development on behavior screeners predicted mean scores for the hallway setting. Chapter 5 discusses implications of these findings and future directions for research in this area.
dc.format.extent237 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectSpecial education
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectCi3T
dc.subjectExpectations
dc.subjectPBIS
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectSESSS
dc.titleExamining the Utility of the Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings (SESSS): A Data-Informed Approach to Developing Expectation Matrices
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberOakes, Wendy P.
dc.contributor.cmtememberSimpson, Richard L.
dc.contributor.cmtememberLeko, Melinda M.
dc.contributor.cmtememberKurth, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.cmtememberJarmolowicz, David P.
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineSpecial Education
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2882-1049
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record