Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGangeddula, Viswa
dc.contributor.authorRanchet, Maud
dc.contributor.authorAkinwuntan, Abiodun E.
dc.contributor.authorBollinger, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorDevos, Hannes
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-21T16:42:09Z
dc.date.available2018-02-21T16:42:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-30
dc.identifier.citationGangeddula V, Ranchet M, Akinwuntan AE, Bollinger K and Devos H (2017) Effect of Cognitive Demand on Functional Visual Field Performance in Senior Drivers with Glaucoma. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9:286. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00286en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/26051
dc.descriptionA grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the effect of cognitive demand on functional visual field performance in drivers with glaucoma.

Method: This study included 20 drivers with open-angle glaucoma and 13 age- and sex-matched controls. Visual field performance was evaluated under different degrees of cognitive demand: a static visual field condition (C1), dynamic visual field condition (C2), and dynamic visual field condition with active driving (C3) using an interactive, desktop driving simulator. The number of correct responses (accuracy) and response times on the visual field task were compared between groups and between conditions using Kruskal–Wallis tests. General linear models were employed to compare cognitive workload, recorded in real-time through pupillometry, between groups and conditions.

Results: Adding cognitive demand (C2 and C3) to the static visual field test (C1) adversely affected accuracy and response times, in both groups (p < 0.05). However, drivers with glaucoma performed worse than did control drivers when the static condition changed to a dynamic condition [C2 vs. C1 accuracy; glaucoma: median difference (Q1–Q3) 3 (2–6.50) vs. controls: 2 (0.50–2.50); p = 0.05] and to a dynamic condition with active driving [C3 vs. C1 accuracy; glaucoma: 2 (2–6) vs. controls: 1 (0.50–2); p = 0.02]. Overall, drivers with glaucoma exhibited greater cognitive workload than controls (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Cognitive demand disproportionately affects functional visual field performance in drivers with glaucoma. Our results may inform the development of a performance-based visual field test for drivers with glaucoma.
en_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017 Gangeddula, Ranchet, Akinwuntan, Bollinger and Devos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleEffect of Cognitive Demand on Functional Visual Field Performance in Senior Drivers with Glaucomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnagi.2017.00286en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2017 Gangeddula, Ranchet, Akinwuntan, Bollinger and Devos. This
is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Copyright © 2017 Gangeddula, Ranchet, Akinwuntan, Bollinger and Devos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.