Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDennin, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Zachary D.
dc.contributor.authorFeig, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Noah
dc.contributor.authorGreenhoot, Andrea Follmer
dc.contributor.authorHildreth, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLeibovich, Adam K.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, James D.
dc.contributor.authorMoldwin, Mark B.
dc.contributor.authorO’Dowd, Diane K.
dc.contributor.authorPosey, Lynmarie A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Tobin L.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Emily R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T19:58:56Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T19:58:56Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-25
dc.identifier.citationDennin, M., Schultz, Z. D., Feig, A., Finkelstein, N., Greenhoot, A. F., Hildreth, M., ... & Posey, L. A. (2017). Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(4), es5.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/25908
dc.description.abstractRecent calls for improvement in undergraduate education within STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines are hampered by the methods used to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Faculty members at research universities are commonly assessed and promoted mainly on the basis of research success. To improve the quality of undergraduate teaching across all disciplines, not only STEM fields, requires creating an environment wherein continuous improvement of teaching is valued, assessed, and rewarded at various stages of a faculty member’s career. This requires consistent application of policies that reflect well-established best practices for evaluating teaching at the department, college, and university levels. Evidence shows most teaching evaluation practices do not reflect stated policies, even when the policies specifically espouse teaching as a value. Thus, alignment of practice to policy is a major barrier to establishing a culture in which teaching is valued. Situated in the context of current national efforts to improve undergraduate STEM education, including the Association of American Universities Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, this essay discusses four guiding principles for aligning practice with stated priorities in formal policies: 1) enhancing the role of deans and chairs; 2) effectively using the hiring process; 3) improving communication; and 4) improving the understanding of teaching as a scholarly activity. In addition, three specific examples of efforts to improve the practice of evaluating teaching are presented as examples: 1) Three Bucket Model of merit review at the University of California, Irvine; (2) Evaluation of Teaching Rubric, University of Kansas; and (3) Teaching Quality Framework, University of Colorado, Boulder. These examples provide flexible criteria to holistically evaluate and improve the quality of teaching across the diverse institutions comprising modern higher education.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Cell Biologyen_US
dc.rights© 2017 M. Dennin et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2017 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. “ASCB ®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0en_US
dc.titleAligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorGreenhoot, Andrea Follmer
kusw.kudepartmentPsychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC5749974en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 M. Dennin et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2017 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. “ASCB ®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2017 M. Dennin et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2017 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. “ASCB ®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.