Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalafox-Hernandez, J. Pablo
dc.contributor.authorLaird, Brian Bostian
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-06T22:29:58Z
dc.date.available2017-12-06T22:29:58Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-23
dc.identifier.citationPalafox-Hernandez, J. P., & Laird, B. B. (2016). Orientation dependence of heterogeneous nucleation at the Cu–Pb solid-liquid interface. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 145(21), 211914.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/25600
dc.description.abstractIn this work, we examine the effect of surface structure on the heterogeneous nucleation of Pb crystals from the melt at a Cu substrate using molecular-dynamics (MD) simulation. In a previous work [Palafox-Hernandez et al., Acta Mater. 59, 3137 (2011)] studying the Cu/Pb solid-liquid interface with MD simulation, we observed that the structure of the Cu(111) and Cu(100) interfaces was significantly different at 625 K, just above the Pb melting temperature (618 K for the model). The Cu(100) interface exhibited significant surface alloying in the crystal plane in contact with the melt. In contrast, no surface alloying was seen at the Cu(111) interface; however, a prefreezing layer of crystalline Pb, 2-3 atomic planes thick and slightly compressed relative to bulk Pb crystal, was observed to form at the interface. We observe that at the Cu(111) interface the prefreezing layer is no longer present at 750 K, but surface alloying in the Cu(100) interface persists. In a series of undercooling MD simulations, heterogeneous nucleation of fcc Pb is observed at the Cu(111) interface within the simulation time (5 ns) at 592 K—a 26 K undercooling. Nucleation and growth at Cu(111) proceeded layerwise with a nearly planar critical nucleus. Quantitative analysis yielded heterogeneous nucleation barriers that are more than two orders of magnitude smaller than the predicted homogeneous nucleation barriers from classical nucleation theory. Nucleation was considerably more difficult on the Cu(100) surface-alloyed substrate. An undercooling of approximately 170 K was necessary to observe nucleation at this interface within the simulation time. From qualitative observation, the critical nucleus showed a contact angle with the Cu(100) surface of over 90°, indicating poor wetting of the Cu(100) surface by the nucleating phase, which according to classical heterogeneous nucleation theory provides an explanation of the large undercooling necessary to nucleate on the Cu(100) surface, relative to Cu(111), whose surface is more similar to the nucleating phase due to the presence of the prefreezing layer.en_US
dc.publisherAIP Publishingen_US
dc.rightsThe following article appeared in TThe Journal of Chemical Physics 145, 211914 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4962424 and may be found at http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4962424.en_US
dc.titleOrientation dependence of heterogeneous nucleation at the Cu–Pb solid-liquid interfaceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorLaird, Brain Bostian
kusw.kudepartmentChemistryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.4962424en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record