dc.contributor.author | Dorsey, Dale | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-09T18:39:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-09T18:39:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dale Dorsey, "Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry," Ethics 126, no. 3 (April 2016): 747-773. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/25312 | |
dc.description.abstract | Actions can be moral or immoral, surely, but can also be prudent or imprudent, rude or polite, sportsmanlike or unsportsmanlike, and so on. The fact that diverse methods of evaluating action exist seems to give rise to a further question: what distinguishes moral evaluation in particular? In this article, my concern is methodological. I argue that any account of the distinctiveness of morality cannot be prior to substantive inquiry into the content of moral reasons, requirements, and concerns. The genuine distinctiveness of morality will become clear only after we have determined what those very reasons, requirements, and concerns really are. | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Chicago Press | en_US |
dc.title | Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Dorsey, Dale | |
kusw.kudepartment | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/684710 | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |