Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRice, Mabel L.
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Ashley L.
dc.contributor.authorSiberry, George K.
dc.contributor.authorMalee, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorZeldow, Bret
dc.contributor.authorFrederick, Toni
dc.contributor.authorPurswani, Murli U.
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Howard J.
dc.contributor.authorSirois, Patricia A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Renee
dc.contributor.authorTorre, Peter, III
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Susannah M.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Paige L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T14:38:01Z
dc.date.available2017-05-24T14:38:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-02
dc.identifier.citationRice, M. L., Buchanan, A. L., Siberry, G. K., Malee, K. M., Zeldow, B., Frederick, T., … for the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study (PHACS), P. L. (2012). Language Impairment in Children Perinatally Infected with HIV Compared to Children Who Were HIV-Exposed and Uninfected. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 33(2), 112–123. http://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e318241ed23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/24284
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate risk for language impairment in children perinatally infected or exposed to HIV. METHOD: We evaluated the prevalence of language impairment (LI) in 7–16 year old children with perinatal HIV infection (HIV+) compared to children HIV-exposed and uninfected (HEU), using a comprehensive standardized language test (CELF-4). LI was classified as primary LI (Pri-LI) (monolingual English exposure and no cognitive or hearing impairment), concurrent LI (Con-LI) (cognitive or hearing impairment), or no LI. Associations of demographic, caregiver, HIV disease and antiretroviral treatment (ART) factors with LI category were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 468 children with language assessments, 184 (39%) had LI. No difference was observed by HIV infection status for overall LI or for Pri-LI or Con-LI; mean (SD) CELF-4 scores were 88.5 (18.4) for HIV+ vs 87.5 (17.9) for HEU. After adjustment, Black children had higher odds of Pri-LI vs no LI (aOR=2.43, p=0.03). Children who were Black, Hispanic, had a caregiver with low education or low IQ, or a non-biological parent as caregiver had higher odds of Con-LI vs no LI. Among HIV+ children, viral load >400 copies/ml (aOR=3.04, p<0.001), CDC Class C (aOR=2.19, p=0.02) and ART initiation <6 months of age (aOR=2.12, p=0.02) were associated with higher odds of Con-LI vs. no LI. CONCLUSIONS: Children perinatally exposed to HIV are at high risk for LI, but such risk was not increased for youth with HIV. Risk factors differed for Pri-LI and Con-LI.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyen_US
dc.subjectPediatric HIV infectionen_US
dc.subjectLanguage impairmenten_US
dc.subjectAntiretroviral therapyen_US
dc.titleLanguage Impairment in Children Perinatally Infected with HIV Compared to Children Who Were HIV-Exposed and Uninfecteden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorRice, Mabel L.
kusw.kudepartmentSpeech-Language-Hearingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/DBP.0b013e318241ed23en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC3310927en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record