Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYe, Qiang
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jonggu
dc.contributor.authorParthasarathy, Ranganathan
dc.contributor.authorPamatmat, Francis
dc.contributor.authorMisra, Anil
dc.contributor.authorLaurence, Jennifer S.
dc.contributor.authorMarangos, Orestes
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Paulette
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-19T16:50:14Z
dc.date.available2017-05-19T16:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.citationYe, Q., Park, J., Parthasarathy, R., Pamatmat, F., Misra, A., Laurence, J. S., Marangos, O. and Spencer, P. (2012), Quantitative analysis of aqueous phase composition of model dentin adhesives experiencing phase separation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 100B: 1086–1092. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32675en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/24247
dc.description.abstractThere have been reports of the sensitivity of our current dentin adhesives to excess moisture, for example, water-blisters in adhesives placed on over-wet surfaces, and phase separation with concomitant limited infiltration of the critical dimethacrylate component into the demineralized dentin matrix. To determine quantitatively the hydrophobic/hydrophilic components in the aqueous phase when exposed to over-wet environments, model adhesives were mixed with 16, 33, and 50 wt % water to yield well-separated phases. Based upon high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array detection, it was found that the amounts of hydrophobic BisGMA and hydrophobic initiators are less than 0.1 wt % in the aqueous phase. The amount of these compounds decreased with an increase in the initial water content. The major components of the aqueous phase were hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and water, and the HEMA content ranged from 18.3 to 14.7 wt %. Different BisGMA homologues and the relative content of these homologues in the aqueous phase have been identified; however, the amount of crosslinkable BisGMA was minimal and, thus, could not help in the formation of a crosslinked polymer network in the aqueous phase. Without the protection afforded by a strong crosslinked network, the poorly photoreactive compounds of this aqueous phase could be leached easily. These results suggest that adhesive formulations should be designed to include hydrophilic multimethacrylate monomers and water compatible initiators.en_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Ye, Q., Park, J., Parthasarathy, R., Pamatmat, F., Misra, A., Laurence, J. S., Marangos, O. and Spencer, P. (2012), Quantitative analysis of aqueous phase composition of model dentin adhesives experiencing phase separation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 100B: 1086–1092. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32675. Which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32675. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archivingen_US
dc.subjectDentin adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectPhase separationen_US
dc.subjectWateren_US
dc.subjectHydrophobicen_US
dc.subjectHydrophilicen_US
dc.titleQuantitative analysis of aqueous phase composition of model dentin adhesives experiencing phase separationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorYe, Qiang
kusw.kuauthorPark, Jonggu
kusw.kuauthorParthasarathy, Ranganathan
kusw.kuauthorPamatmat, Franic
kusw.kuauthorMisra, Anil
kusw.kuauthorLaurence, Jennifer S.
kusw.kuauthorMarangos, Orestes
kusw.kuauthorSpencer, Paulette
kusw.kudepartmentBioengineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.b.32675en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC3673304en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record