ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Finiteness Marking in Boys with Fragile X Syndrome
dc.contributor.author | Sterling, Audra | |
dc.contributor.author | Rice, Mabel L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Warren, Steven F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-07T19:53:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-07T19:53:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sterling, Audra M., Mabel L. Rice, and Steven F. Warren. “Finiteness Marking in Boys with Fragile X Syndrome.” Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR 55.6 (2012): 1704–1715. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/23608 | |
dc.description.abstract | PurposeThis study investigated finite marking (e.g., he walks, he walked) in boys with fragile X syndrome; the boys were grouped based on receptive vocabulary (i.e., borderline, or impaired vocabulary).MethodTwenty-one boys with the full mutation of fragile X, between the ages of 8 to 16 years participated. The boys completed probes from the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (Rice & Wexler, 2001), a language sample, a nonverbal IQ test (Leiter-R, Roid & Miller, 1997), a receptive vocabulary test (PPVT-IV Dunn & Dunn, 2007), and a measure of autistic symptoms (CARS; Schopler et al., 2002).ResultsThere were group differences for finiteness responses on the third person singular probe; the group with impaired vocabulary omitted markers with greater frequency compared to borderline vocabulary group. There were not significant differences on the past tense probe, although boys with borderline and impaired vocabulary were delayed relative to language expectations. Nonverbal IQ was not correlated with the measures of finiteness marking.ConclusionBoys with FXS demonstrate delays in finiteness marking, in particular on past tense verbs. Boys with impaired vocabulary show a unique profile unlike children with SLI, in which their use of tense markers may exceed expectations benchmarked to clause length. | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association | en_US |
dc.subject | Fragile X syndrome | en_US |
dc.subject | Language phenotype | en_US |
dc.subject | Finiteness marking | en_US |
dc.subject | Receptive vocabulary | en_US |
dc.title | Finiteness Marking in Boys with Fragile X Syndrome | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Rice, Mabel L. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Speech-Language-Hearing | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0106) | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |