Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreiner, K. Allen
dc.contributor.authorGeana, Mugur V.
dc.contributor.authorEpp, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Angela
dc.contributor.authorFilippi, Melissa K.
dc.contributor.authorDaley, Christine Makosky
dc.contributor.authorEngelman, Kimberly K.
dc.contributor.authorJames, Aimee S.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Marci
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T20:41:47Z
dc.date.available2017-04-03T20:41:47Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationGreiner, K. Allen, Mugur V. Geana, Aaron Epp, Angela Watson, Melissa Filippi, Christine Makosky Daley, Kimberly K. Engelman, Aimee S. James, and Marci Campbell. "A Computerized Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening for Underserved Populations: Theoretical Background and Algorithm Development." Technology and Health Care 20 (2012): 25-35.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/23564
dc.description.abstractObjective

The aim of this exploratory study was to assess factors deemed by patients as “important” as they planned and considered undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, and to use this data to design a computer-delivered intervention to promote screening.

Methods

Fifty participants 50 years or older, not up-to-date with current recommended CRC screening guidelines, were recruited from a primary care clinic. A semi-structured interview focused on aspects of preparing for colorectal cancer screening was administered; after transcription, researchers used triangulation and consensus to identify relevant themes and concepts.

Results

Four main themes were identified that dealt with issues important for both FOBT and colonoscopy planning: personal concerns, reminders, communication with healthcare providers and obtaining test results. FOBT specific themes included: sample collection and return. For colonoscopy screening, themes included: scheduling, intervention questions, colonoscopy preparation, and transportation. These can be classified as barrier, process and accessory themes. The developed computer-administered implementation intentions algorithm addressed all the identified concerns in a planned and sequential manner, in order to facilitate planning for CRC screening.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that appropriate reminders, explanations of procedures, and patient understanding of temporary life disruptions, help patients develop and accept a detailed screening plan.
en_US
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://content.iospress.com/articles/technology-and-health-care/thc00653en_US
dc.rightsCopyright IOS Pressen_US
dc.subjectColorectal cancer screeningen_US
dc.subjectFOBTen_US
dc.subjectColonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectImplementation intentionsen_US
dc.subjectComputer interventionen_US
dc.subjectUnderserved populationsen_US
dc.titleA computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: Theoretical background and algorithm developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorGeana, Mugur V.
kusw.kudepartmentJournalismen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/THC-2011-0653en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record