Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSmith, David N
dc.contributor.authorFeldmann, Tony Allen
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-08T19:10:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-08T19:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-31
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13403
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/22528
dc.description.abstractDespite the vast amount of research conducted on Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA), there is still not consensus on what causes an individual to be more or less authoritarian. However, researchers have consistently found RWA to be strongly related to perceptions of threat. In the field of developmental psychology the concept of attachment style is thought to account for the differences between individuals in how they respond to perceived threats. The current study investigated whether or not adult attachment styles can account for why individuals are more or less authoritarian. This study assessed how attachment primes impacted scores on a measure of RWA, and whether or not RWA is related to attachment idealization. Results indicated that the attachment primes did not affect scores on RWA, but RWA was found to be positively related to attachment idealization. Possible models of the origins of RWA are discussed.
dc.format.extent59 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectPolitical Science
dc.subjectAttachment
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectAuthoritarianism
dc.subjectBeliefs
dc.subjectPolitical
dc.subjectThreat
dc.titleRight-Wing Authoritarianism, Adult Attachment, and Threat
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberAntonio, Robert J
dc.contributor.cmtememberObadare, Ebenezer
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineSociology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.A.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record