ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
CLASSICAL AND BAYESIAN INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT
dc.contributor.advisor | Gajewski, Byron J | |
dc.contributor.author | Garrard, Lili | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-06T04:51:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-06T04:51:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-05-31 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:14436 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/22504 | |
dc.description.abstract | Both patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) measures are recognized as essential tools for advocating patient-centered care, an important driving force behind the current U.S. health care system. Close collaborations among the research community and regulatory bodies have been initiated to form standardized guidelines for the development and evaluation of PROMs and many ClinRO measures that often are designed as psychometric instruments with ordinal response scales. Classical (i.e., frequentist) instrument development often is time-consuming and challenged by small samples (e.g., cases of rare diseases). An innovative Ordinal Bayesian Instrument Development (OBID) approach within a Bayesian Item Response Theory (IRT) framework is introduced to overcome both small sample size and ordinal data modeling challenges, through efficient integration of content validity and construct validity analyses. The performance of OBID is evaluated under a simulation setting with three different types of expert bias (i.e., unbiased, moderately biased, and highly biased), and further evaluated with an exact Bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) approach using real data applications. Results successfully demonstrated the OBID approach as a promising tool in future PROMs and ClinRO measures development for small populations or rare diseases. Alternatively classical psychometric methodologies are efficient and reliable with relatively large sample sizes. This study also presents the classical psychometric evaluation of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators® (NDNQI®) falls with injury measure, an essential ClinRO measure that supports health care quality improvement efforts and continuous injurious falls research. | |
dc.format.extent | 142 pages | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas | |
dc.rights | Copyright held by the author. | |
dc.subject | Biostatistics | |
dc.subject | Public health | |
dc.subject | Nursing | |
dc.subject | Bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation | |
dc.subject | Bayesian psychometrics | |
dc.subject | Clinician-reported outcome measures | |
dc.subject | Injury falls | |
dc.subject | OBID | |
dc.subject | Patient-reported outcome measures | |
dc.title | CLASSICAL AND BAYESIAN INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.type | Dissertation | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Bott, Marjorie J | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | He, Jianghua | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Wick, Jo A | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Yeh, Hung-Wen | |
dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Biostatistics | |
dc.thesis.degreeLevel | Ph.D. | |
dc.identifier.orcid | ||
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Dissertations [4889]
-
KU Med Center Dissertations and Theses [464]