Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWu, Wei
dc.contributor.authorJia, Fan
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-03T04:39:18Z
dc.date.available2017-01-03T04:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-31
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:14859
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/22401
dc.description.abstractMethods for dealing with non-normal data have been broadly discussed in the structural equation modeling (SEM) literature. The issue of how to properly handle normal missing data has also received enough attention. However, much less research has been done to deal with the situation where non-normality and missingness coexist. Generally speaking, there are three classes of methods for dealing with missing non-normal data (continuous and ordinal) in SEM: a) robust procedures, b) Bayesian analysis, and c) multiple imputation. None of these methods, except for robust full information maximum likelihood (robust FIML), have been systematically evaluated in the SEM context with incomplete non-normal data. In this dissertation, I investigated and compared the performance of the three classes of methods under a broad range of conditions for the two types of missing non-normal data.
dc.format.extent111 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectQuantitative psychology
dc.subjectBayesian analysis
dc.subjectmissing data
dc.subjectmultiple imputation
dc.subjectnon-normal data
dc.subjectrobust procedure
dc.subjectstructural equation modeling
dc.titleMethods for Handling Missing Non-Normal Data in Structural Equation Modeling
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberDeboeck, Pascal
dc.contributor.cmtememberWatts, Amber
dc.contributor.cmtememberSkorupski, William P.
dc.contributor.cmtememberJohnson, Paul E.
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePsychology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record