ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDorsey, Dale
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-13T17:08:33Z
dc.date.available2016-12-13T17:08:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationDale Dorsey, "The Significance of a Life’s Shape," Ethics 125, no. 2 (January 2015): 303-330.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/22188
dc.description.abstractThe shape of a life hypothesis holds, very roughly, that lives are better when they have an upward, rather than downward, slope in terms of momentary well-being. This hypothesis is plausible and has been thought to cause problems for traditional principles of prudential value/rationality. In this article, I conduct an inquiry into the shape of a life hypothesis that addresses two crucial questions. The first question is: what is the most plausible underlying explanation of the significance of a life’s shape? The second question is: given its most plausible explanation, what does the shape of a life hypothesis teach us about the nature of prudential value?en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2015 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.titleThe Significance of a Life’s Shapeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorDorsey, Dale
kusw.kudepartmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/678373en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record