KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Creating Individual Dispersal Hypotheses Improves Stacked Species Distribution Model Performance

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cooper_ku_0099M_14545_DATA_1.pdf (1.410Mb)
    Issue Date
    2016-05-31
    Author
    Cooper, Jacob Christian
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    93 pages
    Type
    Thesis
    Degree Level
    M.A.
    Discipline
    Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
    Rights
    Copyright held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Stacked distribution models are an important step towards estimating species richness and community composition, but they frequently overpredict these metrics. Developing a priori accessible area (i.e., M) hypotheses to limit the training area based on known dispersal and biogeographic barriers is one way to limit these overpredictions. In order to test the effectiveness of Ms for improving model predictions, 293 species of hummingbird (Aves: Trochilidae) were modeled in a uniform training area and within custom M hypotheses. Locality data was drawn from the Global Biodiversity Informatics Facility, while 13 pre-determined test localities were selected from well-sampled hotspots available within the eBird database. Circles with a radius of 20 kilometers around the eBird localities were removed from the testing dataset and aggregated into a known species list. These lists were compared to published checklists when available. Niche models were thresholded to create species distributions models (SDMs) and then stacked to form presence-absence matrices (PAMs). PAMs were derived for the aforementioned testing localities and their predictions of species richness and community composition were contrasted against the known data. While unconstrained (i.e., uniformly trained) models possess egregious overpredictions, M constrained models perform well and are significantly more accurate at assessing these metrics. Analyzing the amount of overprediction against the amount of effort for each locality also suggests that areas with the most effort are the least likely to possess overpredictions, but this requires further study. Using M constrained models is an effective approach for creating near-accurate estimates of species richness and composition, and therefore a much better method for estimating species distributions. Future research should focus on additional methods for improving individual SDMs within the M training region as well as further analyzing the effects of effort on comparison results.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/21834
    Collections
    • Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Dissertations and Theses [351]
    • Theses [3824]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps