dc.contributor.author | Hall, Jeffrey A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Xing, Chong | |
dc.contributor.author | Brooks, Seth | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-15T19:59:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-15T19:59:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-05-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hall, J. A., C. Xing, and S. Brooks. "Accurately Detecting Flirting: Error Management Theory, the Traditional Sexual Script, and Flirting Base Rate." Communication Research 42.7 (2014): 939-58. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/21524 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present manuscript reports two studies on the accuracy of flirting detection. In Study 1, 52 pairs (N = 104) of opposite-sex heterosexual strangers interacted for 10-12 minutes, then self-reported flirting and perceived partner flirting. The results indicated that interactions where flirting did not occur were more accurately perceived than interactions where flirting occurred. In Study 2, 26 one minute video clips drawn from Study 1 were randomly assigned to one of eight experimental conditions that varied flirting base rate and the traditional sexual script. Participant observers (N = 261) attempted to determine if flirting occurred. Results indicated that base rate affected accuracy; flirting was more accurately detected in clips where flirting did not occur than in clips where flirting occurred. Study 2 also indicated that female targets’ flirting was more accurately judged than male targets’ flirting. Findings are discussed in relation to accuracy and courtship context. | en_US |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
dc.subject | Biological sex | en_US |
dc.subject | Courtship | en_US |
dc.subject | Flirting | en_US |
dc.subject | Perceptual accuracy | en_US |
dc.title | Accurately Detecting Flirting: Error Management Theory, the Traditional Sexual Script, and Flirting Base Rate | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Hall, Jeffrey A. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Communications Studies | en_US |
kusw.oanotes | Per SHERPA/RoMEO September 15, 2016: Author's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
Author's Post-print: green tick author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing)
Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF
General Conditions:
Authors retain copyright
Pre-print on any website
Author's post-print on author's personal website, departmental website, institutional website or institutional repository
On other repositories including PubMed Central after 12 months embargo
Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged
Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
Post-print version with changes from referees comments can be used
"as published" final version with layout and copy-editing changes cannot be archived but can be used on secure institutional intranet
Must link to publisher version with DOI | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0093650214534972 | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |