ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSaatcioglu, Argun
dc.contributor.authorStanley, Ryan Keith
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-18T15:42:34Z
dc.date.available2016-06-18T15:42:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-31
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:14359
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/20991
dc.description.abstractThis exploratory study poses a number of important questions regarding the costly reform movement of 1:1 laptop programs. The study seeks to evaluate the extent to which teachers are genuinely adopting the educational reform movement of 1:1 laptop initiatives. The extent to which teachers are genuinely adopting (represented by constructivist teaching practice) versus symbolically adopting (represented by traditional teaching practice) is measured by a survey instrument, the 1:1 Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (1:1 CLES), with follow up interviews conducted to gain additional insight. The study was conducted with teachers in a mid-sized suburban district in the Midwest, which had recently begun implementation of a 1:1 initiative. The results indicated that there is a wide spectrum of traditional and constructivist practice among teachers of the district. Teachers which the survey identified as being constructivist in their use of laptops clearly saw their role as that of a facilitator and consistently used the laptops in methods that applied student-centered instructional approaches. Traditional teachers used the laptops as more of a replacement, communication, and efficiency device, and did not show frequent application of constructivist approaches to how the laptops were used. While there was some variance, the majority of teachers were implementing the 1:1 reform with fidelity as demonstrated by their constructivist instructional practice. This study provides a new lens through which to evaluate the extent of genuine adoption of 1:1 initiatives, looking at the level of adoption of the reform movement as measured by the level of constructivist practice. This lens provides rich opportunities to better understand the extent to which 1:1 laptop initiatives are being adopted. In order to gauge the effectiveness of the reform movement, the level of adoption must first be evaluated.
dc.format.extent122 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectEducational technology
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subject1:1
dc.subjectConstructivism
dc.subjectLaptop
dc.title1:1 LAPTOP INITIATIVES AND TEACHER PRACTICE CHANGE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF CONSTRUCTIVIST TEACHING PRACTICE
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberGinsberg, Rick
dc.contributor.cmtememberFry, Mary
dc.contributor.cmtememberDeLuca, Thomas
dc.contributor.cmtememberPerbeck, Deborah
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineEducational Leadership and Policy Studies
dc.thesis.degreeLevelEd.D.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record