ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJohnson, David
dc.contributor.authorLiebmann, Edward
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T18:20:18Z
dc.date.available2016-06-03T18:20:18Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-31
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:14327
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/20923
dc.description.abstractSubjective memory complaints (SMC) are common among healthy older adults and are associated with negative affect, the Big Five Personality traits, and objective memory decline. Research from geriatric psychiatry, cognitive aging, and personality neuroscience converge on age-related changes in executive function as a third variable that explains the relationship among the same constructs. The present study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test whether executive functioning explains the relationship between SMC and the Big Five. A multiple regression model found that the Big Five were not significant predictors of SMC while controlling for executive function (EF). The single criterion EF model found that executive completely accounted for the shared variance between retrospective memory complaints (RMC) and prospective memory complaints (PMC) and each of the Big Five Factors. Lastly, mediation analyses of the effect of executive function on the relationship between each of the Big Five factors and RMC and PMC found that executive function fully mediated the relationship of all of the Big Five and RMC except for openness. Taken together, the models suggest that executive function has a common causal relationship between the Big Five and SMC. The paper concludes with a discussion of methodological topics including multicollinearity and monomethod covariance inflation that threaten the validity of the current study’s findings.
dc.format.extent78 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectClinical psychology
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectCognitive complaints
dc.subjectExecutive function
dc.subjectMemory complaints
dc.subjectNegative Affect
dc.titlePersonality Traits and Subjective Memory Complaints: Does Executive Function Have an Explanatory Role?
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberKirk, Sarah
dc.contributor.cmtememberWatts, Amber
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplinePsychology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.A.
dc.identifier.orcid
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record